Mentors

  1. James Allen Evans, jevans@uchicago.edu
  2. Robert Gibbons rgibbons1@bsd.uchicago.edu

Co-authors

  1. Michael Msall mmsall@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu
  2. Peter Smith psmith2@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu
  3. Fernando Martinez fjm2003@med.cornell.edu Weil Cornell
  4. Andrew Limper limper.andrew@mayo.edu Mayo Clinic
  5. Gary M. Hunninghake ghunninghake@bwh.harvard.edu Harvard Medical School
  6. R. Parker Ward pward@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
  7. Gurol Suel UCSD, gsuel@ucsd.edu UCSD
  8. Hod Lipson Hod.lipson@columbia.edu Columbia
  9. David Schwartz, Genomics, IPF, david.schwartz@cuanschutz.edu
  10. Edwin Cook, Autism, Genomics, edcook@uic.edu

Concept Buddies

  1. Marian Anghel manghel@lanl.gov LANL
  2. Peter Hraber phraber@lanl.gov LANL
  3. Carolyn Begeman cbegeman@lanl.gov LANL
  4. Yolanda Gill gil@isi.edu AI Institute, USC
  5. Paul Bogdan pbogdan@usc.edu USC
  6. David Wolpart david.h.wolpert@gmail.com Santa Fe Institute
  7. Erika Claud EClaud@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu
  8. Aaron Esser-kahn aesserkahn@uchicago.edu
  9. Don Hedekar hedeker@uchicago.edu
  10. David Llewellyn David.Llewellyn@exeter.ac.uk Exeter University, Alan Turing Institute
  11. James Mastrianni jmast@neurology.bsd.uchicago.edu
  12. Kenneth Rockwood Kenneth.Rockwood@dal.ca Dalhousie University
  13. Eugene Chang echang@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
  14. S. George Djorgovski, Caltech Astrophysics, djorgovski@caltech.edu

Less Interaction

  1. Rick Stevens stevens@anl.gov Aronne National Lab
  2. Ian Foster foster@uchicago.edu
  3. Harold Pollack haroldp@uchicago.edu

Uncertain

  1. Yoav Gilad, Biology, Leadership UChicago, gilad@uchicago.edu (not sure if he CAN write a letter)

Discuusion with Chip Fergusson

Nov 2 11.00 am

  • COAP external members? How do we ensure that COAP has the right context to evaluate the case?
  • Muktidisciplinary background, with emphasis in data science, machine learning, AI , with application sin biomedicine and social systems. Theory/tool design to address hard problems. The mathematics of complex systems modeling and prediction or rare/extreme events.

notes:

https://sites.google.com/site/bsdacademicaffairs/home

  • 6 to 7 letters
  • co-authors are frwowned upon, but they can find other collagues to write letters
  • state of achiements is what letter writers see
  • categorize speaking engagements
  • statement of achievements must cater to both experts and lay biologists and non-biologists
  • chip can look over soa
  • yoav/steve white/meltzer/mentors decide who to get letters from

Table of Contents